Guestbook  
Write a comment for this guestbook entry. Back to Guestbook | Administration
Sign the Guestbook:
675748) IP logged  Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0.0; Win64; x64; ) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.6367.61 Chrome/124.0.6367.61 Not-A.Brand/99  Safari/537.36  Send ICQ Message 
JulianFuela  
oncommi1985(at)mail.ru
Location:
Qatar
Tuesday, 17. September 2024 06:59 IP: 146.70.181.235 Write a comment Send E-mail

The media is in meltdown over Caitlin Clark
[url=https://kraken17at.net]kra1.cc[/url]
The male-dominated sports media apparatus is stumbling over Caitlin Clark.

It is trying to pretend that it hasn’t ignored the WNBA for decades until the superstar rookie came along. But rather than admitting its blind spots, several male commentators are parachuting themselves into a league they barely understand and dismissing anyone who suggests they could do better.
https://kraken-21at.net
kra2
In the flurry of hot takes that followed Chennedy Carter’s foul against Clark over the weekend, ESPN host Pat McAfee went on his show Monday to argue that Clark — whom he casually called the “White b*tch for the Indiana team” — was singularly responsible for the sudden surge of WNBA popularity and therefore she should be given more respect. He later apologized for using the slur, emphasizing that his broader thesis was that Clark’s star power created a halo around a league that’s been languishing in obscurity.

“I was talking about how I hoped that the WNBA and sports media, ex-WNBA players, would show a little bit more respect to Caitlin Clark for what she has brought to the WNBA,” McAfee said on his show Tuesday.

Of course, it’s not that the league was dormant before Clark got there, it’s that most of the mainstream press weren’t paying attention. The impact of Clark’s arri
Comments:
Name:
 
Advanced Guestbook 2.4.4